Can I Get an Awoman?

Thomas Griffin (1/5/21)

Can I Get an Awoman? – Crisis Magazine (1/5/21)

Excerpt: “The recently-opened 117th Congress experienced what could be considered the most laughable prayer ever uttered if it was not in the context of such a serious platform. Representative Emanuel Cleaver from Missouri was sworn in on Sunday, and led a prayer in front of Congress to conclude the process. Ordinarily, this would be an appropriate way to give thanks to God, as well as a good example for all public officials. However, the manner in which this Methodist pastor closed out his prayer is going viral because of its ludicrous nature.

“We ask this in the name of the monotheistic God…God known by many names and by many different faiths. Amen, and awoman.” Apart from the glaring and nonsensical “awoman,” there were many aspects of Cleaver’s prayer which were simply contradictory and illogical. He refers to the monotheistic God while also naming the Hindu god Brahma. He implies that God can be known by several names even if those faiths believe in antithetical views of the divine. In an effort not to offend, we end up with a theological mishmash. 

But back to the cringe-worthy “awoman.” The term amen has its original roots in the Hebrew equivalent which can be defined as “truth” or “certainty” regarding a stance. The Latin term means “so be it,” expressing an affirmation of a truth previously stated. As one approaches to receive the Body of Christ at the Sacrifice of the Mass, he or she responds with amen, stating that he or she believes that this is truly the Body of Christ. The term has absolutely nothing to do with gender identity or equality; the misuse of the term by Representative Cleaver personifies the irrational arguments made by his allies for years now.

Most likely Cleaver was embracing the recently-stated woke desire of Nancy Pelosi to remove all potentially offensive gender specificities in the House; common words such as “he, she, mother, and father” are all now in that ever-expanding “offensive” list. These terms are to be forbidden and set apart as examples of bigotry in order to erode any sense of traditional (truth-based) values of sexual ethics and the family.  What sounds ridiculous to the ordinary observer is in fact directly in line with the movement and trajectory of the left’s ideology over the past decades.

The 1992 landmark Supreme Court case of Casey vs. Planned Parenthood ruled “the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, of the mystery of human life.” The dynamite which was buried during the sexual revolution of the 1960s exploded in Casey and has since spread like a forest fire in recent years. Ever since Casey the Left has been salivating over the possibilities inherent in “defin[ing their] own concept of existence.” 

Read more: Crisis Magazine

Thomas Griffin teaches at a Catholic high school on Long Island and lives with his wife and son. He received a master’s degree in theology and is currently a master’s candidate in philosophy. He writes for several Catholic media outlets.

Shop This Content

Follow My Blog

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.

%d bloggers like this: